Dereliction of Dutys free essay sample

Any person serving in the Armed Forces of America, is guilty of violating this article if they, through any means that can be prevented, disobey any order given by a superior, as long as that order is not itself illegal. Simply put this means that Any person serving in the armed forces:being active, reserve, in a DEP program, deployed on shore or infintry. Regardless of rank rate or posission can be affected by this artice. Through any means that can be prevented: Meaning that if there was any way the servicemember had any reasonable way to prevent the order from not happaning, and did not, are guily of the article. As long as the order is not illegal in its own:Any order that, if carried out, would result in a disobeyal of any of the other UCMJ articles, is illegal. Any order that the superior does not have the authority to give, is illegal. We will write a custom essay sample on Dereliction of Dutys or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The first incedent of article 92 dereliction of duty was 4 March 1945 two United States Army Air Force Luitenets, veared off course in the flight pans, there original orders were to bomb the town of Freiburg Germany. The pilot and his navigator few about 300 kiometers off course to the city of Zurich Switzerland, a neutral country, and the pilot and navigator along with the other five USAAF B-24H bombers droped a twelve in a half ton pay load of high explosives and a tweve ton pay loadofincendiarie bombs. Because of there neglagence of duty and lack of attention to detail the two pilots caused five inecent deaths, in additon to the United States paying 4 Million dollors, in October of 1944. Lieutenant William R. Sincock and one of his navigators, Lieutenant Theodore Q. Balides were sent to cort-martial for there actions and were later aquited and found not guilty for there actions. But if they had payed better attention those peope wouldnt have lost there lives nor would the United states had to have payed monies they did for the distruction of the village and the loss of lives. Other incidents of article 92 are not as sever as the one mentioned above but they are still just as bad and could still have the same negative consaquinces.